Table 3.

APIM of Deviant Behaviors in Adolescent 9th Grade Dating Relationships

N=1488 partners, 744 couples, 54 Schools
	Drunk						Drink						Smoke
Fixed Effects	Model 1 Coef. (Robust SE)		Model 2 Coef. (Robust SE)		Model 3 Coef. (Robust SE)		Model 1 Coef. (Robust SE)		Model 2 Coef. (Robust SE)		Model 3 Coef. (Robust SE)		Model 1 Coef. (Robust SE)		Model 2 Coef. (Robust SE)		Model 3 Coef. (Robust SE)
Individual-Level Variables (Wave 4, 8th Grade)
Female	.01		.00		−.02		.01		.00		−.01		.12		.06		−.02
	.07		.08		.08		.05		.05		.05		.08		.08		.09
White	−.20		−.19		−.24		−.23		−.23		−.20		−.30		−.30		−.23
	.25		.27		.27		.16		.17		.17		.28		.29		.27
Religiosity	−.07	^*	−.06		−.05		−.04		−.04		−.05	^*	−.10	^**	−.09	^*	−.08	^*
	.03		.03		.03		.02		.02		.02		.03		.03		.03
Free Lunch	−.06		−.09		−.11		.02		.04		.04		.44	^*	.38		.44	^*
	.19		.19		.21		.15		.15		.14		.19		.21		.22
Parental Monitoring	−.63	^***	−.60	^***	−.47	^***	−.53	^***	−.51	^***	−.22	^*	−.39	^**	−.39	^**	−.16
	.09		.09		.10		.08		.08		.09		.12		.12		.11
Intact Family	−.24		−.27		−.23		−.04		−.05		−.04		−.10		−.12		−.08
	.19		.18		.18		.14		.14		.14		.18		.18		.21
Grades	−.26	^**	−.23	^*	−.21	^*	−.20	^***	−.18	^***	−.14	^*	−.57	^***	−.51	^***	−.42	^***
	.08		.08		.09		.06		.06		.06		.09		.08		.11
Partner's Behavior	.30		−.07		.07		.14		.03		.08		.99	^***	.68	^*	.77	^**
	.25		.25		.26		.09		.09		.09		.27		.29		.29
Friends' Behavior			2.07	^***	1.34	^**			1.13	^***	.64	^**			2.59	^***	1.19	^*
			.43		.49				.22		.22				.46		.52
Network Size			.06		.04				.07	^**	.05	^*			.07	^*	.05
			.03		.03				.02		.02				.04		.03
Friends-of-Partner Behavior			1.71	^**	1.40	^*			.98	^**	.82	^**			.25		−.44
			.57		.61				.28		.29				.52		.57
Partner's Network Siz			.03		.02				.03	^*	.02				−.04		−.05
			.02		.03				.02		.02				.03		.03
Prior Behavior					1.68	^***					.97	^***					2.68	^***
					.21						.09						.27
Relationship-Level Variables
Reciprocal	−.08		−.19		−.20		−.27	^*	−.34	^**	−.34	^**	.01		−.01		−.05
	.16		.16		.17		.11		.12		.11		.18		.18		.19
8th Grade Couple	−.17		−.26		−.21		−.04		−.07		−.02		−.06		−.09		−.21
	.16		.16		.16		.13		.14		.13		.17		.18		.20
School-Level Variables
Pennsylvania	−.10		−.13		−.17		−.07		−.16		−.13		.32		.23		.06
	.22		.20		.20		.17		.15		.13		.20		.19		.22
Condition	−.17		−.11		−.11		.14		.15		.21		−.06		−.07		−.02
	.18		.17		.18		.12		.12		.12		.16		.15		.18
Network Transitivity Ratio	.05		.73		−.07		−.93		−.46		−.65		.72		1.18		−.89
	2.70		2.50		2.50		1.99		2.02		2.00		2.32		2.03		2.50
Network Centrality	.74		−.11		.08		1.92		1.19		1.00		1.89		2.03		2.92	^*
	1.56		1.51		1.54		.98		1.00		.98		1.10		1.10		1.44
Proportion Dating	.75		.76		.18		.17		−.10		−.79		1.77		1.11		.87
	2.21		.87		2.31		1.44		1.26		1.21		1.41		.70		1.96
Proportion White	1.39		.35		1.05		.29		.12		.25		1.88	^*	1.96		1.78
	.91		2.09		.97		.57		.53		.61		.72		1.39		1.02
Intercept	−1.53	^***	−1.62	^***	−1.64	^***	−2.86	^***	−2.96	^***	−3.23	^***	−1.86	^***	−1.93	^***	−1.95	^***
	.10		.09		.10		.14		.14		.15		.08		.09		.10
Threshold Parameter 1–2							1.44	^***	1.47	^***	1.62	^***
							.11		.11		.12
Threshold Parameter 2–3							2.43	^***	2.49	^***	2.74	^***
							.13		.13		.14
Random Effects Variance Component^a
Couple-Level (r 0)	.16		.17		.17		.28	^*	.27	^*	.25		.15		.31		.38
School-Level (u 00)	.13	^**	.06		.09	^*	.01		.01		.01		.01		.03		.01

p<.05,

^**

p<.01,

^***

p<.001 (two-tailed)

The Level 1 variance for Binary and Ordinal Logistic HGLMs is fixed at π²/3 = 3.29