Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Popul Stud (Camb). 2012 Dec 13;67(1):25–38. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2012.738823

Table 3.

Logistic regression estimates of the effects of positive and negative pregnancy desires, individually and in combination, and two forms of their interaction on the hazard of pregnancy (N=887 women aged 18 or 19, 34,377 observations over 2.5 years in a county in Michigan, United States)

Coefficients
Fi
Core measures
 Desire to become pregnant 0 0.39*** 0.22 *
(0.06) (0.10)
 Desire to avoid pregnancy −0.37 *** −0.24 **
(0.06) (0.09)
Differences between core measures
 Signed difference .23 ***
(.03)
 absolute difference −0.31***
(0.06)
Summary statistics
Chi square 170.52 177.44 174.93 174.72 169.35
Log likelihood −703.71 −703.23 −700.58 −700.59 −707.29
Model pseudo R2 0.141 0.141 0.144 0.144 0.136
Motivational pseudo R2 0 .028 0 .033 0 .035 0.035 0 .023

Note: Coefficients are effects on log odds. Standard errors are in parentheses. Model pseudo R2 includes the effects of both control and motivational variables.

+

p<.10,

*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

***

p<.001 (two-tailed tests)

Source: As for Table 1