Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 1;6(6):1267–1275. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600605

Table 1.

Glucose Diffusivity and Sensor Characteristics

Material Condition Diffusivitya
(cm2/s)
Baseline Lifetimeb
τzero (µs)
Total Percentage Changec
(0–400 mg/dl)
Maximum Sensitivityd
(%/s)
Analytical Rangee
(mg/dl)
pHEMA Untreated (8.1 ± 0.38) ×10-8
(n = 3)
18.5 589 ± 68.9
(n = 7)
2.5 at 4 mg/dl [4.2, 356]
Serum-exposed (3.5 ± 0.43) ×10-8
(n = 3)
17.3 384 ± 70.8
(n = 4)
2.7 at 6.6 mg/dl [6.6, 317]
p(HEMA-coAM) Untreated (2.5 ± 0.08) ×10-6
(n = 3)
13.9 493 ± 55.0
(n = 4)
14.9 at 52mg/dl [17.6, 70.5]
Serum-exposed (1.6 ± 0.16) ×10-6
(n = 3)
14.1 544 ± 88.5
(n = 3)
8.9 at 67 mg/dl [18.1, 107.2]
pAMf Untreated (2.7 ± 0.15) ×10-6
(n = 3)
-–
Serum-exposed (1.4 ± 0.11) ×10-6
(n = 3)
a

Calculated from nonsensing slabs in Side-bi-Side cells at 1-week serum exposure; errors represent 95% confidence.

b

Luminescence lifetime value of sensor slab at 0 mg/dl glucose concentration in air-equilibrated PBS.

c

Errors represent standard deviations between separate hydrogel sensor slabs.

d

Maximum sensitivity represents the highest slope of the response curve. Locations of maximum sensitivity given in concentration of glucose (mg/dl).

e

Range displayed as lower and upper limits in brackets: [lower limit, upper limit].

f

Repeatable response data could not be obtained from pAM sensor gels due to signal instability and therefore are not shown.