Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 1;6(6):1383–1391. doi: 10.1177/193229681200600618

Table 3.

Continuous Glucose Error Grid Analysis (CG-EGA) Results as Obtained by Considering Different Time Lag Compensation Methods

Glycemic range CG-EGA summary output Time Lag compensation method
Uncompensated data Method A: application of a fixed delay Method B: application of a variable delay
Hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dl; 1.4% of the data) Accurate readings 100% 100% 100%
Benign errors 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Significant errors 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Euglycemia (70–180 mg/dl; 61.1% of the data) Accurate readings 94.5% 97.2% 98.3%
Benign errors 5.5% 2.8% 1.7%
Significant errors 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Hyperglycemia(>180 mg/dl; 37.5% of the data) Accurate readings 80.8% 87.2% 95.8%
Benign errors 17.9% 11.5% 2.8%
Significant errors 1.3% 1.3% 1.4%