Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Energy Environ Sci. 2012 Nov 15;6(2):595–607. doi: 10.1039/C2EE23394K

Table 3.

Effect of Drs assumptions on simulated current output and substrate utilization. For each Drs assumption case, total current, acetate flux, and acetate concentration are given. Total current (A/m2) is based on conducted electron transfer from the entire biofilm. Acetate flux (mmol/cm2 day) is a measure of the average flux at the top of the biofilm in the 2 mm × 2 mm surface area NMR measurement voxel. Acetate concentration is given for the acetate available at the bottom of the biofilm in the same NMR measurement voxel. These three measurements were chosen to exemplify the effects of different Drs assumptions.

De Assumption Total
Current
(A/m2)
Top of Biofilm
Acetate Flux
(mmol/cm2 day)
Bottom of Biofilm
Acetate Concentration
(mM)
Non-variable density
 Constant Drs 2.65 0.28 1.55
 Linearly Decreasing Drs 3.12 0.30 2.33
 Empirical Profile Drs 2.88 0.29 1.18
With variable density
 Constant Drs 2.65 0.28 1.55
 Linearly Decreasing Drs 2.54 0.24 0.05
 Empirical Profile Drs 2.53 0.25 0.21