Table 4.

Summary of Regression Analysis Predicting Task Fear from Infant Frontal EEG Asymmetry and Maternal Rating of Fear

Mask Presentation (n=45)	b	SE b	β	t	p	sR2
Step 1
Baseline Asymmetry	−1.13	.28	−.53	−4.06	<.001	.28
Step 2
Baseline Asymmetry	−.72	.32	−.34	−2.29	.03	.08
Task Asymmetry	−.56	.23	−.35	−2.39	.02	.09
Step 3
Baseline Asymmetry	−.50	.32	−.23	−1.57	.12	.03
Task Asymmetry	−.56	.23	−.35	−2.49	.02	.09
IBQ Fear	−.14	.06	−.27	−2.16	.04	.06

Toy Spider (n=43)	b	SE b	β	t	p	sR2
Step 1
Baseline Asymmetry	−.06	.33	−.03	−.17	.87	.001
Step 2
Baseline Asymmetry	.43	.40	.21	1.07	.29	.03
Task Asymmetry	−.66	.34	−.37	−1.95	.06	.09
Step 3
Baseline Asymmetry	.46	.44	.21	1.02	.32	.02
Task Asymmetry	−.66	.34	−.38	−1.92	.06	.09
IBQ Fear	−.01	.08	−.02	−.095	.93	.002

Stranger Approach (n=42)	b	SE b	β	t	p	sR2
Step 1
Baseline Asymmetry	.03	.32	.02	.10	.92	.002
Step 2
Baseline Asymmetry	.23	.32	.11	.70	.49	.01
Task Asymmetry	−.38	.19	−.33	−2.04	.05	.10
Step 3
Baseline Asymmetry	.10	.37	.05	.27	.79	.002
Task Asymmetry	−.36	.19	−.31	−1.87	.07	.08
IBQ Fear	.06	.08	.14	.78	.44	.01

Note. Step 1 R² = .28, p<.001; Step 2 ΔR² = .09, p= .02; Step 3 ΔR² = .06, p= .04

Note. Step 1 R² = .001, p=.87; Step 2 ΔR² = .09, p=.06; Step 3 ΔR² = .000, p=.93

Note. Step 1 R² < .001, p=.92; Step 2 ΔR² = .10, p=.05; Step 3 ΔR² = .02, p=.44