Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 3;52(6):996–1010. doi: 10.1021/bi3010347

Table 3. Measured NMR and MD-Predicted 3J Couplings (hertz) at 278 K for Each Force Field with the A-Form (C3′-endo/anti) Starting Structure.

torsion NMR scalar couplinga parm99b parm99χb parm99TORb,c A-formd angle (deg)e
C1 H1′–H2′ ≤1.0 5.6 0.7 0.5 (0.6) 0.0–1.0 91–104
C2 H1′–H2′ ≤1.0 4.6 0.5 0.5 (0.7) 0.0–1.0 91–104
C3 H1′–H2′ ≤1.0 3.6 0.6 0.5 (0.6) 0.0–1.0 91–104
C4 H1′–H2′ 2.6 6.7 1.5 1.8 (1.9) 0.0–1.0 116
C1 H2′–H3′ 3.6 5.1 4.4 4.3 (4.3) 3.8–4.8 50
C2 H2′–H3′ 4.3 5.0 4.4 4.4 (4.3) 3.8–4.8 42
C3 H2′–H3′ 4.7 5.1 4.5 4.4 (4.4) 3.8–4.8 38
C4 H2′–H3′ 4.9 5.1 4.7 4.9 (4.8) 3.8–4.8 36
C1 H3′–H4′ 8.7 5.2 7.7 7.8 (7.8) 7.6–8.6 f
C3 H3′–H4′ 8.8 5.8 7.7 7.9 (7.9) 7.6–8.6 f
C4 H3′–H4′ 7.2 3.6 7.1 6.7 (7.0) 7.6–8.6 205
C2 H4′–H5′ ≤1.0 2.5 2.6 2.8 (3.0) 1.6–2.6 f
C3 H4′–H5′ 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.8 (2.8) 1.6–2.6 63
C4 H4′–H5′ 2.0 2.3 2.5 3.7 (2.9) 1.6–2.6 62
C2 H4′–H5″ ≤1.0 4.9 3.9 3.2 (3.1) 2.9–4.4 f
C3 H4′–H5″ ≤1.0 3.8 3.5 3.1 (3.2) 2.9–4.4 f
C4 H4′–H5″ 1.4 4.3 3.8 3.4 (3.5) 2.9–4.4 292
C1 H3′–C2 P 8.8 5.1 8.7 7.1 (8.3) 6.9–9.4 1
C2 H3′–C3 P 9.3 5.6 9.0 3.8 (5.2) 6.9–9.4 3
C3 H3′–C4 P 9.3 5.8 8.6 4.7 (5.0) 6.9–9.4 3
C2 P–C2 H5′ 3.8 3.1 3.8 4.2 (5.0) 3.4–6.6 309
C3 P–C3 H5′ 3.9 3.8 3.8 3.7 (4.1) 3.4–6.6 309
C4 P–C4 H5′ 3.8 2.7 3.6 6.2 (4.3) 3.4–6.6 309
C2 P–C2 H5″ 1.2 3.0 2.3 2.6 (2.4) 0.9–1.9 72
C3 P–C3 H5″ 0.5 2.4 2.2 2.5 (2.2) 0.9–1.9 f
C4 P–C4 H5″ 1.1 3.3 2.4 4.2 (3.7) 0.9–1.9 74
a

The error limit is ±0.5 Hz for scalar couplings of >1.0 Hz.

b

Marino et al.54 equations (Table S13 of the Supporting Information) were used to calculate 3J couplings for each time point of the MD trajectory, and then the couplings were averaged.

c

Parentheses indicate MD predicted 3J scalar coupling values calculated from 0 to 770 ns. After 770 ns, C1 intercalates between C3 and C4.

d

Range of values measured from four CC doublets in PDB entry 1QC0.57

e

Torsion angles determined via NMR (Table S13 of the Supporting Information). For scalar couplings of <1.0 Hz, an angle range covering 0–1 Hz is shown.

f

Could not be calculated with Marino et al.54 equations (Table S13 of the Supporting Information).