Table 1.
Prevalence of Wolbachia in B. sellowii and B. glaber populations.
|
B. sellowii
|
B. glaber
|
|||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locality | N (F/M) | Strain | IF | IM | II | N (F/M) | Strain | IF | IM | II |
| ABE (6) | 7/12 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26/21 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BRI (5) | 20/6 | wSel1 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 13/8 | wGla1 | 11 | 4 | 15 |
| CAS (15) | 11/5 | wSel2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 18/12 | wGla1 | 11 | 4 | 16 |
| CID (11) | 13/11 | wSel7 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 26/6 | wGla3 | 24 | 4 | 28 |
| CSU (7) | 8/5 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - |
| CZ3 (2) | 25/13 | wBal2 wSel6 | 4* | 1* | 5* | 15/17 | wGla1 | 12 | 8 | 20 |
| GLO (10) | 11/5 | wSel3 wSel7 | 2* | 0* | 2* | - | - | - | - | - |
| MOS (14) | - | - | - | - | - | 10/5 | wGla2 | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| MSA (9) | - | - | - | - | - | 33/11 | wBal2 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| PAL (12) | 14/8 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - |
| PEL (1) | 11/5 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6/5 | - | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| POA (8) | 20/4 | wSel4 wSel5 | 8* | 1* | 9* | - | - | - | - | - |
| SLS (3) | 13/6 | wSel8 wSel9 | 8* | 2* | 10* | - | - | - | - | - |
| TAP (4) | 12/6 | wSel9 wSel10 | 0* | 4* | 4* | - | - | - | - | - |
| TAV (14) | 10/4 | wBal1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13/9 | wBal1 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Total | 175/90 | 30 | 12 | 42 | 160/94 | 77 | 22 | 99 | ||
N = Number of individuals tested (Females; Males); IF: Number of infected females; IM: Number of infected males; II: Number of infected individuals.
*:
Overall prevalence (individuals may harbor one or both sequences found in these populations) -: Species not found; Populations: PEL (1) (Pelotas); CZ3 (2) (Colônia Z3); SLS (3) (São Lourenço do Sul); TAP (4) (Tapes); BRI (5) (Barra do Ribeiro); ABE (6) (Águas Belas); CSU (7) (Caxias do Sul); POA (8) (Porto Alegre); MSA (9) (Morro Santana); GLO (10) (Glorinha); CID (11) (Cidreira); PAL (12) (Palmares do Sul);. MOS (13) (Mostardas); TAV (14) (Tavares); CAS (15) (Cassino).