Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 4;6:48. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-48

Table 1.

Per-protocol and intention-to-treat cecal intubation rates by intervention

 
Intervention
  Unaided colonoscope (A) Standard wire (B) Firm wire (C)
Number
37
38
37
Per-protocol Cecal intubation rate
(30) 81.1% (CI, 67.8 – 94.3%)
(27) 71.1% (CI, 55.9 – 86.2%)
*(26/35) 74.3% (CI, 59.1 – 90%)
Intention-to-treat Cecal intubation rate (36) 97.3% (CI, 91.8 – 100%) (35) 92.1% (CI, 83.1 – 100%) (31) 83.8% (CI, 71.3 – 96.2%)

*Two cases in this group are excluded from the per-protocol analysis as failure occurred before the assigned intervention could be introduced.

Chi-squared test of difference between per-protocol A and B cecal intubation rate, P = 0.31.

Chi-squared test of difference between per-protocol A and C cecal intubation rate, P = 0.49.

Exact McNemar’s test of difference between intention-to-treat and per-protocol cecal intubation rate under intervention A, P = 0.0313.