Table 1.
|
Intervention |
||
---|---|---|---|
Unaided colonoscope (A) | Standard wire (B) | Firm wire (C) | |
Number |
37 |
38 |
37 |
Per-protocol Cecal intubation rate |
(30) 81.1% (CI, 67.8 – 94.3%) |
(27) 71.1% (CI, 55.9 – 86.2%) |
*(26/35) 74.3% (CI, 59.1 – 90%) |
Intention-to-treat Cecal intubation rate | (36) 97.3% (CI, 91.8 – 100%) | (35) 92.1% (CI, 83.1 – 100%) | (31) 83.8% (CI, 71.3 – 96.2%) |
*Two cases in this group are excluded from the per-protocol analysis as failure occurred before the assigned intervention could be introduced.
Chi-squared test of difference between per-protocol A and B cecal intubation rate, P = 0.31.
Chi-squared test of difference between per-protocol A and C cecal intubation rate, P = 0.49.
Exact McNemar’s test of difference between intention-to-treat and per-protocol cecal intubation rate under intervention A, P = 0.0313.