Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 13;8(2):e56184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056184

Table 5. Grade specific risk of excess mortality due to prostate cancer modelled using the full likelihood approach.

Gleason <7 Gleason = 7 Gleason 8–10 Unknown Gleason
Relative Excess Risk (95% CI) p value Relative Excess Risk (95% CI) p value Relative Excess Risk (95% CI) p value Relative Excess Risk (95% CI) p value
SIMD 2004, Quintiles
1 (least deprived) 1 1 1 1
2 1.20 (0.41, 3.52) 0.742 0.94 (0.44, 1.99) 0.871 1.05 (0.81, 1.36) 0.702 1.25 (0.90, 1.73) 0.192
3 1.69 (0.62, 4.64) 0.309 1.01 (0.48, 2.12) 0.981 1.42 (1.13, 1.79) 0.003 1.02 (0.73, 1.46) 0.875
4 1.61 (0.61, 4.26) 0.005 1.36 (0.73, 2.55) 0.331 1.48 (1.19, 1.84) <0.001 1.06 (0.78, 1.43) 0.722
5 (most deprived) 2.61 (1.09, 6.26) 0.031 0.84 (0.39, 1.82) 0.657 1.36 (1.10, 1.69) 0.005 1.47 (1.13, 1.92) 0.004
Period of diagnosis
1997–2002 1 1 1 1
2003–2007 0.19 (0.05, 0.74) 0.017 0.39 (0.27, 0.68) <0.001 0.78 (0.68, 0.90) <0.001 1.87 (1.55, 2.40) <0.001

All estimates were adjusted for age at incidence.