Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb;48(2):191–201. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2012.12.002

Table 2.

Lifespan analyses frh-1 RNAi on different kinase mutants summary statistics.

Genotype RNAi Mean Lifespan + SEM p vs con p vs N2 Sample size (censored)a N of replicates
Wild-type (N2) con 17.2 0.2 460 (40) 7
frh-1 20.6 0.3 4.9E − 17 468(100) 7
aak-2(rr48) con 12.6 0.3 1.06E − 26 198 (61) 3
frh-1 16.3 0.4 1.5E − 12 0.17044 197 (43) 3
aak-2(ok524) con 17.9 0.3 0.20326 319 (53) 5
frh-1 23.1 0.3 1.5E − 27 1.39E − 34 330 (54) 5
aak-1(tm1994) con 16.5 0.4 0.33077 190 (28) 3
frh-1 21.5 0.6 3.6E − 08 1.06E − 10 191 (61) 3
aak-1(tm1994); aak-2(ok524) con 14.6 0.3 3.85E − 01 191 (57) 3
frh-1 17.9 0.3 6.9E − 10 0.38536 188 (38) 3
par-4(it57) con 16.6 0.5 0.40960 140 (40) 2
frh-1 21.2 0.5 1.6E − 08 2.44E − 10 140 (35) 2

Wild-type (N2) con 16.4 0.3 200(10) 3
frh-1 19.8 0.4 1.2E − 08 1.17E − 08 200(32) 3
sad-1(ky289) con 15.8 0.6 0.78698 120(46) 2
frh-1 20.8 1.0 0.00003 0.00001 121(40) 2
kin-29(gk270) con 12.1 0.2 1.29E − 18 139(22) 2
frh-1 16.1 0.4 5.1E − 12 0.72663 141(30) 2
mml-1(ok849) con 15.2 0.4 0.23012 200(40) 3
frh-1 19.6 0.4 1.5E − 09 7.96E − 08 199(30) 3

p-values were calculated using the log-rank test between pooled populations.

a

Pooled worms from N replicate experiments (censored individuals were included in the log rank analysis).