Table 2.
Baseline Sexual Risk Behaviors | aOR (95% CI) | p-value |
---|---|---|
Frequency of alcohol use† | ||
Never had alcohol | ||
Male | REF | |
Female | REF | |
Used alcohol less than 1 time a week | ||
Male | .190 (.050, .725) | .015 |
Female | 3.76 (1.30, 10.9) | .014 |
Used alcohol greater than 1 time a week | ||
Male | .244 (.061, .980) | .047 |
Female | 1.37 (.338, 5.55) | .661 |
Protected sex with casual partners in the last 3 months | ||
Regular partner only | ||
Had protected sex half the time or greater with casual partner/s | REF | |
14–16 | 6.19 (2.58, 14.9) | .000 |
17–19 | 3.54 (2.07, 6.04) | .000 |
20–24 | 2.02 (1.21, 3.36) | .007 |
25–29 | 1.15 (.502, 2.65) | .738 |
Had protected sex less than half the time with at least one casual partner | ||
14–16 | 22.8 (4.41, 117.5) | .000 |
17–19 | 6.59 (2.32, 18.7) | .014 |
20–24 | 1.91 (.741, 4.90) | .181 |
25–29 | .552 (.129, 2.36) | .661 |
Had any sex drunk or high in last 3 mos. | 1.32 (.755, 2.34) | .324 |
Age (14–16, 17–19, 20–24, 25–29) | .938 (.740, 1.19) | .594 |
Female | .101 (.029, .352) | .000 |
Note: A multiple logistic regression model using general estimating equation methods was constructed by first including independent variables with the strongest associations with baseline STI and then adding or removing variables that improved model fit (quasi-likelihood under the independence assumption model criterion). Multicollinearity and goodness of fit were examined for the final model. Hosmer and Lemeshow’s goodness-of-fit test indicated that the model fits the data well (p = .612).
aOR: adjusted odds ratio, CI: Confidence Interval.
For this variable, frequency of alcohol use was assessed by asking, “During the past 12 months, how often did you drink alcoholic beverages?” Response options were: “None,” “Once a month or less,” “2–3 days a month,” “About once a week,” “2–3 days a week,” “4–6 days a week” and “Everyday.” The distribution of responses and association with STIs informed the categorization at less/more than weekly alcohol use.