Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jan 22.
Published in final edited form as: Biochemistry. 2013 Jan 11;52(3):466–476. doi: 10.1021/bi301341r

Table 4.

Additivity of mutant cycles

graphic file with name nihms435258u1.jpg
Reference Modification #1 Modificaiton #2 Double modification
Ka-PEP [mM] Modification description Ka-PEPb [mM] ΔΔG1a (kcal/mol) Modification description Ka-PEP [mM] ΔΔG2a (kcal/mol) Calculated ΔΔG1 + ΔΔG2 (kcal/mol) Ka-PEP [mM] Δ ΔG3a (kcal/mol)
Wild Type 0.240±0.002 Δ2–10 0.605±0.004 0.55±0.01 C436S 0.802±0.004 c 0.726±0.008 1.28±0.02 1.139±0.003 0.938±0.007
C436N 0.703±0.004 c 0.647±0.008 1.20±0.02 1.016±0.005 0.869±0.008
S12D 0.552±0.007 0.50±0.01 C436S 0.802±0.004 c 0.726±0.008 1.23±0.02 0.89±0.01 0.79±0.01
C436N 0.703±0.004 c 0.647±0.008 1.15±0.02 0.95±0.01 0.83±0.01
C338A 0.93±0.01 0.82±0.01 1.32±0.02 2.09±0.02 130±0.01.
a

ΔG = change in free energy associated with PEP binding. ΔΔG = the difference in ΔG of PEP binding of modified protein relative to that of the wild type enzyme. Conversion of Ka-PEP to ΔG is based on the generally accepted view that PYK isozymes function as rapid equilibrium systems (30). As such, the free energy associated with PEP binding was calculated by ΔG=−RTln Ka-PEP.

b

values from (12)

c

values from Table 2