Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 23;5(2):574–582. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.1043

Table III.

Association between the expression of CXCR1/2 and indicators of proliferation, growth, apoptosis, angiogenesis, invasion and metastasis.

CXCR1/2 expression
Indicator expression Negative (n=1) Weak (n=45) Strong (n=23) P-value
Phosphorylation
  AKT 0.339
    Negative 0 5 0
    Weak 1 25 13
    Strong 0 15 10
  pAKT 0.032
    Negative 1 1 1
    Weak 0 15 6
    Strong 0 29 16
  ERK 0.725
    Negative 0 0 0
    Weak 1 9 6
    Strong 0 36 17
  pERK <0.001
    Negative 0 2 0
    Weak 1 19 1
    Strong 0 24 22
Proliferation and growth
  Ki-67 0.456
    Negative 1 6 5
    Weak 0 28 11
    Strong 0 11 7
  Cyclin D1 0.049
    Negative 0 8 2
    Weak 1 32 13
    Strong 0 5 8
  EGFR 0.013
    Negative 1 14 3
    Weak 0 25 12
    Strong 0 6 8
Apoptosis
  Bcl-2 0.003
    Negative 0 4 0
    Weak 1 21 10
    Strong 0 20 13
  Bax 0.103
    Negative 1 6 3
    Weak 0 34 15
    Strong 0 5 5
Angiogenesis
  VEGF 0.678
    Negative 0 2 1
    Weak 1 23 12
    Strong 0 20 10
  MVD 0.001
    <20 1 31 9
    ≥20 0 14 14
Invasion and metastasis
  MMP-9 0.013
    Negative 1 11 1
    Weak 0 29 16
    Strong 0 5 6
  MMP-2 0.027
    Negative 1 14 6
    Weak 0 30 15
    Strong 0 1 2
  TIMP-2 0.843
    Negative 0 24 11
    Weak 1 21 11
    Strong 0 0 1
  E-cadherin 0.414
    Negative 0 12 4
    Weak 1 28 17
    Strong 0 5 2

Tumor samples of patients were divided into negative, weak and positive groups of immunohistochemical expression. The tumor samples were divided into high and low MVD groups assessed with the mean microvessel density value of 20 as the cut-off value. CXCR1/2, C-X-C chemokine receptor types 1/2; MVD, microvessel density.