Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Aging. 2011 Sep;26(3):503–517. doi: 10.1037/a0022687

Table 4.

Associations Between Strategy Clustering, Memory, and Everyday Functional Ability by Intervention Group: Results from ACTIVE (N=1,401)

Clustering score
mediator
Outcome Regressions of strategy
clustering trajectories on
training (Path A)
Regressions of outcome
trajectories on strategy
clustering trajectories (Path
B)
Regressions of outcome
trajectories on training
(Path C)
Mediated path (A*B)
β 95% CI β 95% CI β 95% CI Product 95% CI
HVLT Semantic Functioning 0.61 * (0.51, 0.71) 0.36 * (0.11, 0.61) −0.21 (−0.40, −0.02) 0.22 * (0.06, 0.38)
Memory 0.41 * (0.19, 0.62) −0.25 (−0.45, −0.05) 0.25 * (0.11, 0.39)
HVLT Subjective Functioning 0.31 * (0.19, 0.43) 0.41 * (0.09, 0.73) 0.00 (−0.17, 0.17) 0.13 * (0.02, 0.24)
Memory 0.49 * (0.19, 0.79) −0.02 (−0.25, 0.20) 0.15 * (0.04, 0.26)
HVLT Serial Functioning −0.13 (−0.27, 0.01) 2.11 (−0.08, 4.30) −0.31 (−1.14, 0.52) −0.28 (−0.69, 0.12)
Memory 2.29 * (0.20, 4.37) −0.37 (−1.27, 0.53) −0.31 (−0.72, 0.11)
AVLT Subjective Functioning 0.27 * (0.17, 0.38) 0.77 * (0.26, 1.29) 0.03 (−0.21, 0.27) 0.21 * (0.05, 0.37)
Memory 0.82 * (0.42, 1.22) 0.01 (−0.26, 0.28) 0.22 * (0.08, 0.36)
AVLT Serial Functioning 0.27 * (0.16, 0.38) 0.74 * (0.11, 1.36) −0.14 (−0.39, 0.11) 0.20 * (0.01, 0.39)
Memory 0.82 * (0.25, 1.38) −0.19 (−0.47, 0.10) 0.22 * (0.04, 0.40)

Legend. Results from two-group parallel process latent growth curve models of standardized clustering scores with piecewise linear growth and composite memory growth processes. Models are adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, self-rated health status, and education. 95% CI: 95% Confidence interval.