Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct;18(10):1466–1471. doi: 10.1177/1352458512442438

Table 2.

Change in PASAT-3” scores from baseline through the placebo-controlled phase and the follow-up phase.

Placebo-controlled phase Year 2a Year 2 (LOCF)b
IFNβ-1b treatmentc 2.3± 6.3, 1.0 (0 to 5.00) (n = 191) 2.0 ± 6.3, 1.0 (–1.0 to 4.0) (n = 273)
Placebo treatmentc 0.8 ± 5.5, 0.5 (–1.0 to 3.0)) (n = 88) 0.6 ± 5.4, 0.5 (–1.0 to 3.0) (n = 166)
p valued 0.018 0.021
Follow-up phase Year 5 Year 5 (LOCF)
Early treatmentc 3.4 ± 6.2, 2.0 (0 to 6.0)) (n = 227) 3.0 ± 6.0, 2.0 (0 to 6.0) (n = 285)
Delayed treatmentc 1.5 ± 6.8, 1.0 (–1.0 to 4.0)) (n = 120) 1.0 ± 6.5, 1.0 (–1.0 to 4.0) (n = 174)
p valued 0.005 <0.001
a

Includes only those patients who did not progress to CDMS until year 2.

b

Includes patients who progressed to CDMS before year two or prematurely discontinued study.

c

Data are mean ± SD, median (interquartile range).

d

Non-parametric analysis of covariance for change in PASAT-3’’ score from baseline.

IFNβ-1b: interferon beta-1b; LOCF: Last observation carried forward; PASAT-3”: Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test-3”