Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 15.
Published in final edited form as: Biomaterials. 2008 Sep 17;29(35):4575–4583. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.010

Table 4.

Table showing the results of the individual t-tests for percent crystallinity for each material-geometry-rate combination along with the respective control (undeformed) data. Gray shading indicates significance (p≤0.05)

30 kGy Control Comparisons p-value
30kGy Control vs 30kGy Smooth 30mm/min 0.0046
150mm/min 0.0380
Notched 30mm/min 0.0049
150mm/min 0.9635
SA Control Comparisons
SA Control vs SA Smooth 30mm/min 0.0016
150mm/min 0.0349
Notched 30mm/min 0.5317
150mm/min 0.0767
Material Comparisons
30kGy vs SA Control 0.2596
Smooth 30mm/min 0.0023
150mm/min 0.6732
Notched 30mm/min 0.2133
150mm/min 0.1992
Notch Comparisons
Smooth vs Notched 30kGy 30mm/min 0.5326
150mm/min 0.1989
SA 30mm/min 0.0066
150mm/min 0.3043
Rate Comparisons
30mm/min vs 150mm/min 30kGy Smooth 0.6557
Notched 0.1708
SA Smooth 0.2434
Notched 0.2805