Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 22;8:47. doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-8-47

Table 2.

Recovery of phytohormones from different sample matrices on polystyrene/ divinylbenzene-based Cromabond® HR-XC material

Matrix SA ABA JA 12-OH-JA JA-Ile OPDA
 
Slope
R2
Rec.
Slope
R2
Rec.
Slope
R2
Rec.
Slope
R2
Rec.
Slope
R2
Rec.
Slope
R2
Rec.
Recovery control
453.48
0.99
1.00
75.12
0.99
1.00
105.27
0.99
1.00
431.91
0.99
1.00
541.36
0.99
1.00
126.64
0.99
1.00
20% Methanol
397.59
0.99
0.88
90.73
0.99
1.21
110.37
0.97
1.05
497.68
1.00
1.15
533.24
1.00
0.98
122.33
1.00
0.97
Methanolic extract
558.56
0.96
1.23
76.50
0.92
1.02
108.49
0.97
1.03
444.99
0.98
1.03
532.82
1.00
0.98
118.41
0.99
0.93
Reconstituted methanolic extract 392.81 0.77 0.86 55.25 0.86 0.49 81.27 0.88 0.64 156.24 0.83 0.44 424.25 0.99 0.67 77.65 0.95 0.50

The analyte abundances (peak heights) were plotted against their defined concentrations and correlation of these two parameters was estimated (linear regression coefficient was calculated). The phytohormone recoveries (Rec.) were determined as ratios of slopes compairing corresponding concentration-intensity plots obtained with and without SPE procedure.