Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 28;40(2):021715. doi: 10.1118/1.4788653

Table 2.

Characteristics of the ten patients in the study including treatment site, number of parameters and fields used in the clinical optimization, and the number of optimization cycles (≈0.5 × run no.) that were required to achieve an acceptable IMRT plan.

Patient Treatment site No. of parameters No. of fields Run no.
1 Floor of mouth 34 7 45
2 Nasopharynx 65 9 48
3 Nasopharynx 59 7 37
4 Nasopharynx 52 9 15
5 Oropharynx 43 7 75
6 Base of tongue 37 7 19
7 Nasopharynx 52 7 19
8 Nasopharynx 54 7 16
9 Larynx 47 7 35
10 Larynx 45 7 65