Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychooncology. 2012 Oct 12;22(8):1731–1737. doi: 10.1002/pon.3202

Table 1.

Comparison of Family Demographic Characteristics for Pediatric Brain Tumor Survivors (PBTS) and Classmate-Controls

PBTS Controls
M SD M SD ta p db rc
Mother
Education 14.3 2.1 14.7 2.2 −1.58 .117 −0.19 .25**
Family Environment Scale
Supportive 30.0 7.0 32.4 6.5 −3.95 .000 −0.36 .02
Conflicted −9.5 4.7 −10.4 4.5 2.09 .038 −0.20 .11
Controlling 10.2 4.4 9.6 4.5 1.52 .130 −0.13 .20*

Father
Education 14.4 2.5 14.7 2.5 −0.43 .671 −0.12 .25*
Family Environment Scale
Supportive 29.5 6.2 29.8 7.1 −0.62 .541 −0.04 .12
Conflicted −9.9 4.8 −9.9 5.3 −0.29 .777 0.00 .01
Controlling 10.8 4.2 10.8 3.7 0.25 .804 0.00 .21

Family Demographics
SESd 53.4 21.2 58.3 21.9 −2.19 .030 −0.23 .22**
a

Two-tailed, dependent groups t-tests, df =152 to 160 for mothers and df =91 to 127 for fathers, p denotes significance of t

b

Cohen’s d estimating effect size assuming independent groups [30]

c

Correlation between scores for matched-pairs of PBTS and classmate-control families to evaluate group dependency

d

Revised Duncan Scores of occupational prestige; when two parents reported occupations, the higher was used

*

p≤.05,

**

p≤.01,

***

p≤.001