Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007 Dec;50(6):1404–1424. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2007/098)

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Actual (filled circles) versus predicted (open circles) performance (based on multiple looks), grouped by number of standard stimulus repetitions. The top panel shows performance for /pa/ versus /ta/ at +2 dB signal-to-noise ratio (SNR; n = 10), the middle panel shows that for /ra/ versus /la/ at −2 dB SNR (n = 10), and the bottom panel shows performance for /sa/ versus /ʃa/ at −4 dB SNR (n = 10).