Skip to main content
. 2013 Jan 7;280(1750):20122262. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2262

Table 1.

Summary movement, foraging and diving information for 2009 KI (n = 5) and 2005/2010 MI (n = 7) seals which migrated to the East Antarctic shelf region. The term forage denotes periods defined (using the covariate SSM) as ‘resident’ movement. Values represent mean ± s.d. (range) across individual animals.

KI males (n = 5) MI females (n = 7)
percentage trip on shelf 49 ± 15 (30–65) 56 ± 20 (20–79)
daysa on shelf 101 ± 31 (65–132) 92 ± 40 (36–159)
percentage shelf time forage 82 ± 13 (64–95) 76 ± 30 (11–97)
no. forage events 4 ± 1 (3–5) 2.3 ± 1.1 (1–4)
no. shelf forage events 3.2 ± 0.8 (2–4) 1.6 ± 0.8 (1–3)
forage run lengths (daysa) 32 ± 14 (12–46) 47 ± 27 (17–103)
shelf forage run lengths (daysa) 29 ± 15 (12–46) 51 ± 30 (4–103)
percentage shelf dives benthicb 75 ± 22 (43–95) 78 ± 20 (42–97)
percentage shelf forage dives benthic 76 ± 25 (40–100) 81 ± 22 (44–100)

aNote that ‘days’ actually represents model days, which are 12 h time steps. Behavioural switches of less than 2 time steps were discounted.

bBenthic diving was ascertained where the maximum dive per time step was within 50 m of the bathymetry for an estimated location, based on the fine-scale (2 min) ETOPO2 v. 2 grid from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Geophysical Data Center (http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/global/relief/ETOPO2/ETOPO2v2-2006/ETOPO2v2c/).