Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 12;24(3):843–850. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds526

Table 4.

Estimated annual reduction in cancers diagnosed in stage III/IV as opposed to stage I/II in England that could be achievable if gender, deprivation and old age inequalities (2006–2010) were eliminated*

Gender Deprivation Old age Gender, deprivation and old age combined
Potential reduction in cancers diagnosed in advanced stage as a percentage of all new cancer diagnoses
 Melanoma 2.00 (1.10, 2.89) 3.06 (1.91, 4.22) 2.67 (1.86, 3.48) 6.78 (5.48, 8.09)
 Prostate n/a 2.62 (1.73, 3.51) 2.99 (2.07, 3.92) 5.45 (4.29, 6.62)
 Endometrial n/a 3.10 (1.25, 4.95) 1.51 (0.46, 2.57) 4.39 (2.52, 6.27)
 Lung 1.21 (0.41, 2.01) 2.45 (1.45, 3.44) 3.75 (2.42, 5.08)
 Renal 2.75 (0.66, 4.83) 2.75 (0.66, 4.83)
 Breast (women) n/a 1.45 (0.78, 2.13) 0.93 (0.47, 1.38) 2.32 (1.54, 3.11)
 Bladder 1.87 (0.71, 3.03) 1.87 (0.71, 3.03)
Potential reduction in the number of cancers diagnosed in advanced stage
 Prostate n/a 952 (628, 1277) 1089 (753, 1425) 1984 (1561, 2407)
 Lung 423 (143, 703) 854 (507, 1202) 1310 (846, 1774)
 Breast (women) n/a 611 (328, 894) 390 (199, 580) 976 (646, 1306)
 Melanoma 209 (115, 302) 320 (200, 440) 279 (194, 363) 708 (572, 844)
 Endometrial n/a 202 (82, 323) 99 (30, 167) 287 (164, 409)
 Renal 186 (45, 328) 186 (45, 328)
 Bladder 170 (64, 275) 170 (64, 275)

*Details are provided in Methods section. Note that the estimated potential combined impact of eliminating inequalities in stage at diagnosis by gender, deprivation and old age is not equal to the sum of the individual impacts because certain individuals may be subject to more than one inequality. No data shown for colon, rectal and ovarian cancer, because of no evidence of socio-demographic variation by gender (as applicable), deprivation or old age group (see Table 3).