Table III.
β
11
|
β
12
|
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
β * 11 | β † 12 | λ ‡ | Bias§ | MSE¶ | Bias | MSE |
0.69 | 0 | 0 | 0.001 | 0.033 | 0.015 | 0.010 |
1000 | 0.001 | 0.034 | 0.001 | 0.000 | ||
1.79 | 0 | 0 | 0.011 | 0.036 | −0.009 | 0.013 |
1000 | 0.011 | 0.036 | 0.000 | 0.000 | ||
1.79 | 0.69 | 0 | −0.010 | 0.038 | 0.011 | 0.008 |
1 | −0.013 | 0.035 | −0.001 | 0.007 | ||
1.79 | 1.79 | 0∥ | 0.049 | 0.038 | 0.005 | 0.009 |
1 | 0.031 | 0.033 | −0.028 | 0.010 |
Simulated log odds ratio for association between x1 and membership in class 1, relative to class 3.
Simulated log odds ratio for association between x1 and membership in class 2, relative to class 3.
Candidate value for tuning parameter. Results are shown for λ=0 and the candidate λ value which minimized R, the cross-validated log-likelihood loss for the largest number of simulated data sets.
, where si are simulation iterations.
Mean square error =.
In the case of β11=β12=1.79, R was minimized with λ=0 in all 100 simulated data sets.