Table 5.

Comparison with other QRS detection algorithms.

Reference	Method	Accuracy (%)
Proposed algorithm	SVM	97.5%
J. Pan, and W. J. Tompkins [4]	Dynamic threshold	99.3%
P. E. Trahanias [5]	Mathematical morphology	99.48%
F. Gritzali [7]	Length and energy transformation	99.6%
Y. -C. Yeh, and W. -J. Wanga [8]	Difference operation method	99.81
M. Adnane et al. [28]	Morphological features	99.64%
M. Paoletti and C. Marchesi [32]	Karhunen-Loève transform	99.15%
S. S. Mehta and N. S. Lingayat [9]	SVM	98.12%
S. S. Mehta et al. [17]	K-mean	98.66%