Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 17.
Published in final edited form as: Chembiochem. 2008 Jun 16;9(9):1481–1486. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200700768

Table 1.

Results from the reaction shown in Equation 1 as a function of ligand and applied electrochemical potential. The reported yields were obtained by quantitative LC-MS analysis of aliquots removed at the indicated times, and are the average of three independent runs (error ±5%).

graphic file with name nihms411631u1.jpg
Entry Reductant Copper Ligand % Yield 15 min % Yield 60 min
1 E, none [a] None none 1 1
2 none CuSO4 none 3 3
3 E, none [a] CuSO4 any 3 3
4 Ascorbate [b] CuSO4 none 4 8
5 Ascorbate [b] CuSO4 2 82 97
6 Ascorbate [b] CuSO4 3 68 68
7 Ascorbate [b] CuSO4 4 98 99
8 E, -50mV CuSO4 none 3 5
9 E, -200mV CuSO4 none 4 8
10 E, -50mV CuSO4 2 58 84
11 E, -200mV CuSO4 3 98 99
12 E, -200mV CuSO4 4 6 42
[a]

In the electrochemical cell with electrodes disconnected.

[b]

1 mM sodium ascorbate.