Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 19;12:606. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-606

Table 1.

Summary of observational studies on the association between ARA and risk of colorectal cancer

References Study Subjects Exposure Assessment Colorectal cancer assessment (diagnosis) Adjustment for potential confounders Assessment of reporting quality * Main findings
Intergroup comparison   P or Ptrend
Study design: cohort study
Exposure assessment: dietary intake
Murff et al. 2009 [30]
SWHS, China, 1996-2007, prospective cohort design (7-year biennial follow-up, follow-up rate = 96.7%)
73,243 women aged 40-70, no prior history of cancer
SWHS's FFQ, 77 items, previously validated against 24 x 24-HDR
Self-reported physician diagnosis, combined with annual record linkage with the Shanghai Cancer Registry and Shanghai Vital Statistics database
Age at baseline, total energy intake, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, energy-adjusted total red meat consumption, menopausal status, use of HRT, multivitamin, aspirin, total n-3 PUFA intake, n-6 to n-3 PUFA ratio
18
Dietary ARA intake, g/day, quintile, median
RR (95%CI)
Ptrend
Q1: 0.02
1.00
0.03
Q2: 0.03
1.20 (0.87-1.64)
Q3: 0.05
1.44 (1.05-1.98)
Q4: 0.06
1.61 (1.17-2.23)
Q5: 0.09
1.39 (0.97-1.99)
Lin et al. 2004 [28]
WHS, USA, 1993–2003, prospective cohort design nested randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled 2 × 2 factorial aspirin and vitamin A trial (average 8.7 years follow-up)
37,547 female health professionals aged ≥45, free of heart disease and cancer except NMSC
FFQ, 131 items, validated against 2 x 7-day WR
Self-reported physician diagnosis, reviewed and confirmed medical diagnoses
Age, treatment assignment, BMI, family history of CRC, colorectal polyps, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol intake, use of HRT, total energy intake
15
Dietary ARA intake, %energy, quintile, median
RR (95%CI)
Ptrend
Q1: 0.04
1.00
0.55
Q2: 0.06
0.86 (0.57-1.32)
Q3: 0.07
0.84 (0.55-1.28)
Q4: 0.09
0.73 (0.47-1.14)
Q5: 0.12
0.90 (0.59-1.36)
Study design: nested case-control study
Exposure assessment: blood ARA level
Hall et al. 2007 [34]
PHS, USA, 1982-1995, nested case-control design within a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled factorial aspirin and beta-carotene trial (average 5 and 7 years follow-up)
178 CRC patients, 282 controls, male physicians without history of cancer aged 40-84 years at baseline, 1 case matched with 1-2 controls by age, smoking status
Whole blood fatty acids, GC analysis blinded to case-control status at a time, precision indicated
Self-report, combined with review of medical records
None
23
ARA composition%, geometric mean(95%CI) Case:
ARA composition%, geometric mean(95%CI) Control:
P
9.77(9.57-9.99)
9.93(9.77-10.10)
Not significant
Kojima et al. 2005 [35]
JACC Study, Japan, 1988-1997, nested case-control design (7 years follow-up)
169 primary CRC patients, 481 controls without previous history of cancer, aged 40-79 years at baseline, 1 case matched with 2-3 controls by age, sex, resident area
Serum fatty acids, GC analysis blinded to case-control status, precision not indicated
Population-based cancer registries, supplemented by death certificates
Age at completing final education, family history of CRC, BMI, smoking status, alcohol intake, intake of green leafy vegetables, physical activity
23
ARA composition, weight % of total serum lipids, quartile
OR (95%CI)
P trend
Men:
Men:
Men:
Q1: <3.71
1.00
0.99
Q2: 3.71-4.619
1.24 (0.55-2.78)
Q3: 4.62-5.269
0.79 (0.32-1.96)
Q4: ≥5.27
1.16 (0.49-2.75)
Women:
Women:
Women:
Q1: <4.20
1.00
0.40
Q2: 4.20-4.879
0.67 (0.31-1.46)
Q3: 4.88-5.634
0.49 (0.22-1.10)
Q4: ≥5.635
0.65 (0.30-1.44)
Study design: case-control study (temporal relationship among exposure and outcome is demonstrated)
Exposure assessment: dietary intake
Theodoratou et al. 2007 [36]
Survey, UK, 1999-2006, case-control design
1,455 primary CRC patients aged 16-79, 1,455 controls (eligibility criteria not shown), matched by age, sex, resident area
Scotish FFQ, 150 items, validated against 4-day WR, (response rate = case 82%, control 97%)
Not shown
Family history of CRC, total energy intake, total fiber intake, alcohol intake, NSAIDs use, smoking status, BMI, physical activity, total fatty acid intake
20
Dietary ARA intake, mg/day, quartile
OR (95%CI)
Ptrend
Q1: 0-5.82
1.00
0.163
Q2: 5.83-8.40
1.09 (0.87-1.37)
Q3: 8.41-11.34
0.79 (0.63-1.01)
Q4:≥11.35
0.93 (0.72-1.19)
Nkondjock et al. 2003 [31]
Survey, Canada, 1989-1993, case-control design
402 CRC patients aged 35-79, 688 controls, matched by age, language, place of residence
FFQ, 132 items, validated against 7-day Food Record
Histological diagnosis
Age, BMI, family history of CRC, marital status, physical activity
20
Dietary ARA intake, g/day, quartile
OR (95% CI)
Ptrend
Q1:<0.06
1.00
0.001
Q2:0.06-0.09
1.24 (0.84-1.84)
Q3:0.10-0.14
1.64 (1.12-2.40)
Q4:>0.14
2.11 (1.47-3.06)
Slattery et al. 1997 [37]
Survey, USA, 1991-1994
1993 CRC patients aged 30-79, 2410 controls without history of CRC (population characteristic partially not shown), matched by age, sex, resident state
CARDIA Diet History Questionnaire, validated against 7 x 24-HDR
Cancer registries
Total energy intake, age at selection, BMI, family history of CRC, physical activity, dietary cholesterol, calcium, fiber, NSAIDs use
19
Dietary ARA intake, g/MJ, quintile
OR (95%CI)
Ptrend
Men:
Men:
Men:
Q1:<0.17
1.00
Not shown
Q2:0.17-0.22
1.25 (0.95-1.65)
Q3:0.23-0.26
1.08 (0.81-1.44)
Q4:0.27-0.33
1.37 (1.03-1.83)
 
Q5:>0.33
1.17 (0.85-1.61)
 
Women:
Women:
Women:
Q1:<0.039
1.00
Not shown
Q2:0.039-0.051
0.99 (0.73-1.33)
 
Q3:0.052-0.063
1.15 (0.86-1.55)
 
Q4:0.064-0.077
0.98 (0.72-1.35)
 
Q5:>0.077
0.98 (0.70-1.37)
 
Exposure assessment: blood ARA level
Kuriki et al. 2006 [38]
Survey, Japan, 2002-2004, case-control design
74 CRC patients, 221 controls, aged 20-80 without history of cancer or current diseases, 1 case matched with 3 controls by age, sex, season of blood collection
Erythrocyte phospholipids, GC analysis blinded to case-control status, precision indicated
Histological diagnosis
BMI, habitual exercise, alcohol intake, smoking status, green-yellow vegetable intake, family history of CRC
22
ARA composition, mol%, tertile
OR (95% CI)
Ptrend
T1: <8.625
1.00
<0.05
T2: 8.625-10.178
0.91 (0.48-1.73)
T3: >10.178
0.42 (0.18-0.95)
Study design: case-control study (temporal relationship among exposure and outcome is unclear)
Exposure assessment: dietary intake
Busstra et al. 2003 [39]
Survey, Netherlands, 1995-1998, case-control design
52 CRC patients, 57 controls, aged under 75 without history of CRC, colon resection, polyposis coli, inflammatory bowel disease, included subjects with familial HNPCC, matching not indicated
FFQ developed for the Dutch cohorts of the EPIC study, 178 items, validated against 12 x 24-HDR
Histological diagnosis
Age, total energy intake, sex, familial background of HNPCC
13
Dietary ARA intake, g/day, tertile
OR (95% CI)
Ptrend
T1: <0.02
1.0
0.37
T2: 0.02-0.04
1.3 (0.4-3.9)
T3: ≥0.04
0.6 (0.2-1.8)
Exposure assessment: blood ARA level
Ghadimi et al. 2008 [40]
Survey, Japan, 1997-2003, case-control design
203 CRA patients, 179 controls (negative faecal occult blood test), matching not indicated
Serum fatty acids (fasting blood), GC analysis, precision indicated
Histological diagnosis
Age, BMI, family history of CRA or CRC, history of diabetes, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activity, season of data collection
18
ARA concentration, mg/dl, quartile
OR (95%CI)
Ptrend
Men:
Men:
Men:
Q1:<17.40
1.00
0.104
Q2:17.40-19.90
0.60 (0.21-1.68)
Women:
Q3:19.91-22.50
0.58 (0.21-1.60)
0.001
Q4:>22.50
0.52 (0.19-1.42)
 
Women:
Women:
Women:
Q1:<18.05
1.00
0.001
Q2:18.05-20.50
0.49 (0.19-1.24)
 
Q3:20.51-22.38
0.11 (0.28-0.45)
 
Q4:>22.38
0.11 (0.03-0.43)
 
Baró et al. 1998 [41]
Survey, Spain
17 CRC patients aged 35-82, 12 controls aged 33-81 with no malignant diseases, matched by age, resident area
Plasma and erythrocyte fatty acids (fasting blood), GC analysis, precision not indicated
Not shown
None
12
Plasma ARA concentration, mg/dl, mean(SEM)
Plasma ARA concentration, mg/dl, mean(SEM)
P
Case:
Control:
Plasma:
18.59(1.31)
21.31(1.22)
Not significant
Erythrocyte ARA composition%, mean(SEM)
Erythrocyte ARA composition%, mean(SEM)
Erythrocyte:
Case:
Control:
Not significant
14.61(0.24)
13.50(0.40)
Neoptolemos et al. 1990 [42]
Survey, UK
32 CRC patients, 42 controls admitted for elective operations for benign without DM, metabolic disorders, blood transfusions, matched by age, sex, admittance period
Erythrocyte phospholipids (fasting blood), GC analysis, precision not indicated
Not shown
None
13
ARA composition%, median(range)
ARA composition%, median(range)
P
Case:
Control:
 
20.7(12.8-48.9)
18.0(0.0-47.3)
Not significant
Neoptolemos et al. 1988 [43]
Survey, UK
49 CRC patients aged 49-92, 49 controls with benign diaseases aged 48-90, matched by age, sex
Erythrocyte phospholipids (fasting blood), GC analysis, precision not indicated
Not shown
None
12
ARA composition%, median(range)
ARA composition%, median(range)
P
Case:
Control:
 
21.8 (15.3-28.4)
23.5 (13.8-32.8)
0.043
Exposure assessment: tissue ARA level
Busstra et al. 2003 [39]
Survey, Netherlands, 1995-1998, case-control design
52 CRC patients, 57 controls, aged under 75 without history of CRC, colon resection, polyposis coli, inflammatory bowel disease, included subjects with familial HNPCC, matching not indicated
Buttock adipose tissue fatty acids, GC analysis, precision not indicated
Histological diagnosis
Age, total energy intake, sex, familial background of HNPCC
13
ARA composition mass%, tertile
OR(95%CI)
Ptrend
T1: <0.35
1.0
0.42
T2: 0.35-0.45
2.6 (0.7-8.5)
T3: ≥0.45
1.7 (0.5-5.8)
Study design: cross-sectional study
Exposure assessment: blood ARA level
Almendingen et al. 2006 [44]
Survey, Norway
38 FAP patients aged 24-70 (all colectomized), 160 healthy controls aged 21-66
Serum phospholipids (fasting blood), GC analysis, precision indicated
Diagnosis by endoscopy and histology
None
17
ARA composition weight%, mean(SD)
ARA composition weight%, mean(SD)
P
Case:
Control:
 
10.96(1.85)
7.26(1.51)
≤0.0001
Fernández-Bañares et al. 1996 [45]
Survey, Spain
22 colonic cancer patients, 27 colonic adenoma patients, 12 controls with benign diseases, no significant differences in sex and age
Plasma phospholipids (fasting blood), GC analysis, precision not indicated
Total fibreoptic colonoscopy
None
13
ARA composition%, mean(SEM) Carcinoma:
ARA composition%, mean(SEM) Controls:
P
9.38(0.37)
10.2(0.32)
Not significant
Adenoma:

9.95(0.49)
Hietanen et al. 1994 [46]
Survey, UK, cross-sectional design
20 colon cancer patients aged 38-84, controls, matched by age, sex, smoking status
Erythrocyte phospholipids (fasting blood), GC analysis, precision not indicated
Not shown
None
8
ARA concentration, mg/dl, mean(SD)
ARA concentration, mg/dl, mean(SD)
P
Case:
Control:
 
18.5(0.6)
20.2(0.5)
<0.05
Exposure assessment: tissue ARA level
Fernández-Bañares et al. 1996 [45]
Survey, Spain
15 colonic cancer patients, 21 colonic adenoma patients, 8 controls with benign diseases
Normal colon mucosa fatty acids, GC analysis, precision not indicated
Total fibreoptic colonoscopy
None
13
ARA composition%, mean(SEM) Carcinoma:
ARA composition%, mean (SEM) Controls:
P
10.9(0.57)
11.4 (0.88)
Not significant
Adenoma:
 
12.3(0.55)
 
Berry et al. 1986 [47] Survey, Israel, 1982-1985 155 consecutive colonoscopies (53 carcinoma, 34 benign neoplastic polyps, 68 controls) Buttock adipose tissue fatty acids, GC analysis, precision indicated Histological diagnosis None 13 ARA composition%, mean (SD) Carcinoma:
ARA composition%, mean (SD) Controls:
P
0.54 (0.2)
0.55 (0.2)
Not significant
Benign neoplastic polyps:
 
0.52 (0.2)

24-HDR 24-h dietary recall, ARA Arachidonic acid, BMI Body mass index, CRA Colorectal adenoma, CRC Colorectal cancer, DM Diabetes mellitus, FAP Familial adenomatous polyposis, FFQ Food frequency questionnaire, GC Gas chromatography, HNPCC Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer, HRT Hormone replacement therapy, JACC Japan Collaborative Cohort, NMSC Nonmelanoma skin cancer, NSAIDs Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, OR Odds ratio, PHS Physician's health study, RR Relative risk, SWHS Shanghai Women's Health Study, UK United Kingdom, USA United States of America, WHS Women's Health Study, WR Weighed dietary record.

*Result of the critical evaluation carried out using the STROBE tool.