Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 7;13:50. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-50

Table 7.

Levels of agreement: attitudinal comparisons by respondent groups towards value of RCA process and need for further education

Survey items
Group 1: Respondents who led or participated in RCA n=101 (%)
Group 2: Respondents who did not participate or lead RCA n=127 (%)
All respondents n=228 (%)
Chi Square
  Agree Unsure Disagree Agree Unsure Disagree Agree Unsure Disagree χ2 Df P
Considering the health systems investment in RCA training, are the benefits you see worth the investment?
74 (73.3)
21 (20.8)
5 (5.0)
75 (59.1)
45 (35.4)
4 (3.1)
149 (65.4)
66 (28.9)
9 (4.0)
6.347
2
0.042
Undertaking a RCA is a time-consuming business. Is it good use of staff time and resources?
87 (86.1)
10 (9.9)
4 (4.0)
90 (70.9)
28 (22.0)
5 (3.9)
177 (77.6)
38 (16.7)
9 (3.9)
6.591
2
0.037
 
Yes
No
Unsure
Yes
No
Unsure
Yes
No
Unsure
χ2
Df
P
Do you think a follow-up training session after you had actually conducted a RCA would be beneficial?
66 (65.3)
8 (7.9)
23 (22.8)
50 (39.4)
3 (2.4)
19 (50.0)
116 (50.0)
11 (4.7)
42 (18.1)
1.188
2
0.552
Would receiving confidential peer-feedback on your final RCA report be beneficial as part of your learning? 84 (83.2) 1 (1.0) 16 (15.8) 47 (37.0) 1 (0.8) 15 (11.8) 131 (56.5) 2 (0.9) 31 (13.4) 1.773 2 0.412