Table 7.
Levels of agreement: attitudinal comparisons by respondent groups towards value of RCA process and need for further education
Survey items |
Group 1: Respondents who led or participated in RCA n=101 (%) |
Group 2: Respondents who did not participate or lead RCA n=127 (%) |
All respondents n=228 (%) |
Chi Square |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Agree | Unsure | Disagree | Agree | Unsure | Disagree | Agree | Unsure | Disagree | χ2 | Df | P | |
Considering the health systems investment in RCA training, are the benefits you see worth the investment? |
74 (73.3) |
21 (20.8) |
5 (5.0) |
75 (59.1) |
45 (35.4) |
4 (3.1) |
149 (65.4) |
66 (28.9) |
9 (4.0) |
6.347 |
2 |
0.042 |
Undertaking a RCA is a time-consuming business. Is it good use of staff time and resources? |
87 (86.1) |
10 (9.9) |
4 (4.0) |
90 (70.9) |
28 (22.0) |
5 (3.9) |
177 (77.6) |
38 (16.7) |
9 (3.9) |
6.591 |
2 |
0.037 |
|
Yes |
No |
Unsure |
Yes |
No |
Unsure |
Yes |
No |
Unsure |
χ2 |
Df |
P |
Do you think a follow-up training session after you had actually conducted a RCA would be beneficial? |
66 (65.3) |
8 (7.9) |
23 (22.8) |
50 (39.4) |
3 (2.4) |
19 (50.0) |
116 (50.0) |
11 (4.7) |
42 (18.1) |
1.188 |
2 |
0.552 |
Would receiving confidential peer-feedback on your final RCA report be beneficial as part of your learning? | 84 (83.2) | 1 (1.0) | 16 (15.8) | 47 (37.0) | 1 (0.8) | 15 (11.8) | 131 (56.5) | 2 (0.9) | 31 (13.4) | 1.773 | 2 | 0.412 |