Table 1.
Vectors and systems for gene targeting and myocardial delivery
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
Advantages | Disadvantages | ||
Non-Viral | Plasmids | Simplified construction, versatility of expression cassette size, favorable biosafety risk profiles | Low transduction efficiency, transient expression |
|
|||
Liposomes | Allow for targeting at the cell surface, ultrasound manipulation possible, favorable biosafety risk profiles | More complex construction, usually requires competent blood flow, transient expression | |
| |||
Viral | Replication Deficient Adenoviruses | Large DNA packaging possible, enters both dividing and non-dividing cells, well suited for myocardial delivery | Serotype immunogenicity, potential cytotoxicity, transient expression |
|
|||
Adeno-associated Virus | Greater stability than Adenovirus, enters both dividing and non- dividing cells, well suited for myocardial delivery, longer periods of expression, reduced immunogenicity | DNA insertion possible causing oncogenic potential, smaller DNA packaging | |
|
|||
Lentivirus | Integrates into host DNA for long term expression, minimal immunogenicity | Smaller DNA packaging, high tropism for dividing cells, insertional mutagenesis |