Table 3.

Odds Ratio of Having Family-Centered Care Among U.S. Children at No/Low, Moderate, and High Risk for Developmental, Behavioral, and Social Delay

	% With Outcome	Unadjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)*	Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% CI)*†
Family-centered care (composite measure)‡
No/low risk	77	Referent	Referent
Moderate risk	66	0.58 (0.47–0.71)§	0.65 (0.52–0.80)§
High risk	53	0.34 (0.27–0.42)§	0.47 (0.36–0.62)§
Elements of family-centered care¶
Doctors spend enough time
No/low risk	86	Referent	Referent
Moderate risk	79	0.62 (0.49–0.79)§	0.74 (0.56–0.97)§
High risk	69	0.38 (0.30–0.49)§	0.59 (0.44–0.78)§
Doctors listen carefully
No/low risk	94	Referent	Referent
Moderate risk	89	0.57 (0.42–0.77)§	0.65 (0.47–0.92)§
High risk	83	0.33 (0.24–0.46)§	0.46 (0.32–0.67)§
Doctors provide needed information
No/low risk	91	Referent	Referent
Moderate risk	85	0.59 (0.44–0.79)§	0.66 (0.50–0.88)§
High risk	76	0.32 (0.24–0.42)§	0.43 (0.31–0.58)§
Doctors are sensitive to family’s values and customs
No/low risk	93	Referent	Referent
Moderate risk	87	0.54 (0.41–0.72)§	0.63 (0.46–0.86)§
High risk	82	0.36 (0.26–0.48)§	0.51 (0.36–0.73)§
Doctors help parent feel like a partner in care
No/low risk	93	Referent	Referent
Moderate risk	89	0.61 (0.46–0.80)§	0.70 (0.52–0.93)§
High risk	82	0.34 (0.25–0.47)§	0.46 (0.33–0.65)§

^*Odds ratio of outcome for at-risk children compared to no/low-risk children.

^†Adjusted for child race/ethnicity, age, gender, health insurance type, household poverty level, highest educational attainment, primary language spoken at home, and child special health care need.

^‡For FCC composite measure, n = 21,981.

^§Significant findings.

^¶We did not perform separate analyses for the family-centered care component of receiving needed interpreter services because this question was only asked of a small proportion of our sample; this item is included in the family-centered care composite measure.