Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 18.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Oct 2;27(3):311–323. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.07.018

Figure 6. Contrast-to-Noise Ratios (CNR) with a Difference in A (cylindrical symmetry) of 0.01 for EAR and FA Using Monte Carlo Simulations with 200,000 Repetitions.

Figure 6

(a) Noise level 1%; (b) Noise level 2%; (c) Noise level 5%; (d) Noise level 10%. CNRs of EAR and FA are generally similar. When noise increases, the CNR for EAR tends to be higher than that of FA.