Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 24;10:115. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-10-115

Table 5.

Scoring of patient’s multifactorial lifestyle by impact points in healthy and unhealthy lifestyle groups

  Total number Healthy lifestyle (< 3 Points)a Unhealthy lifestyle (> 2 Points)b p-value
Number of Patients
1654
1484
 
170
 
 
ml/sample (mean ± sd)
 
2.5
± 1.3
2.8
± 1.6
<0.001
Mio/ml (mean ± sd)
 
23.9
± 32.7
22.4
± 23
n.s.
Mio/sample (mean ± sd)
 
58.5
± 110.2
58.6
± 68.7
n.s.
Grade a Sperm (%)
 
5.3
± 8.2
4.5
± 7.7
<0.05
Grade b Sperm (%)
 
32.5
± 17.9
31.4
± 17.5
n.s.
Grade c Sperm (%)
 
18.3
± 14.4
17.7
± 13.7
n.s.
Grade d Sperm (%)
 
43.9
± 20.4
46.2
± 20.9
n.s.
Class I (%)
 
6.5
± 6.6
5.6
± 5.9
<0.01
Class II (%)
 
42.8
± 14.4
43.7
± 14.4
n.s.
Class III (%)   50.7 ± 18.2 50.7 ± 17.5 n.s.

Factors which might negatively affect sperm quality such as BMI (> 25 kg/m2), age (> 50 years), coffee (> 3 cups/day), sexual abstinence (> 2 days) and ejaculation frequency (< 4 times/month) were scored with one point and set in correlation to semen parameters. Cut-off for (un-)healthy lifestyle was set to 2 points. a 216 patients = 0 points, 656 patients = 1 point; 613 patients = 2 points; b 149 patients = 3 points; 20 patients = 4 points, 1 patient = 5 points; n.s.: not significant.