Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 19.
Published in final edited form as: J Hosp Med. 2009 Sep;4(7):433–440. doi: 10.1002/jhm.573

Table 1.

Characteristics of Studies Included in Review

Author Study Design Intervention Setting and Study Population Target Outcomes
Nursing Kelly, 200542 Pre-post Change to walk-round handover (at bedside) from baseline (control) 12-bed rehab unit with 18 nurses and 10 patients Staff, patient 11/18 nurses felt more or much more informed & involved, 8/10 patients felt more involved
Pothier, 200543 Controlled simulation Compared pure verbal to verbal with “note-taking” to verbal plus typed content Handover of 12 simulated patients over 5 cycles System (data loss) Minimal data loss with typed content, compared to 31% data retained with note-taking and no data retained with verbal only
Wallum, 199544 Pre-post Change from oral handover (baseline) to written template read with exchange 20 nurses in a geriatric dementia ward Staff 83% of nurses felt care plans followed better, 88% knew care plans better
Technology or Structured Template Cheah, 200545 Pre-post Electronic template with free-text entry compared to baseline 14 UK Surgery residents Staff 100% (14) of residents rated electronic system as desirable, but 7 (50%) reported that information not updated
Lee, 199646 Pre-post Standardized sign-out card for interns to transmit information during handoffs compared to handwritten (baseline) Inpatient cardiology service at IM residency program in Minnesota with 19 new interns over a 3 month period Staff Intervention interns (n=10) reported poor sign-out less often than controls (n=9) [intervention 8 nights (5.8%) vs. control 17 nights (14.9%); p = 0.016]
Kannry, 199947 Pre-post Compared web-based sign-out program to usual system (baseline) An academic teaching hospital in New York (34 patients admitted in 1997; 40 patients admitted in 1998) System Improved provider identification (86% web sign-out vs. 57% hospital census)
Petersen, 199848 Pre-post 4 months of computerized signouts compared to baseline period (control) 3,747 patients admitted to the medical service at an academic teaching hospital Patient Preventable adverse events (ADE) decreased (1.7% to 1.2%, p< 0.10); risk of cross-cover physician for ADE eliminated
Ram, 199349 Pre-post Compared handwritten (baseline) to computer-generated Family medicine residents at 2 academic teaching hospitals [Buffalo (n=16) and Pittsburgh (n=16)] Staff Higher satisfaction after electronic sign-out, but complaints with burden of data entry and need to keep information updated
Van Eaton, 200450 Pre-post Use of UW Cores-links sign-out to list for rounds & IS data 28 surgical and medical residents at 2 teaching hospitals System At 6 months, 66% of patients entered in system (adoption)
Van Eaton, 200551 Prospective, randomized, crossover study. Compared UW Cores* integrated system compared to usual system Fourteen inpatient resident teams (6 surgery, 8 IM) at 2 teaching hospitals for 5-months Staff, system 50% reduction in the perceived time spent copying data from [24% to 12% (p < 0.0001)] and number of patients missed on rounds (2.5 vs. 5 patients/team/month, p = 0.0001); improved sign-out quality (69.6% agree or strongly agree); and improved continuity of care (66.1% agree or strongly agree)