Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 13;6:121–136. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S32299

Table 2.

Studies evaluating neuromodulation for the treatment of postamputation pain

Implant type Implant location Study Number of implants Criteria for successful outcome Follow-up Successful outcomes
MCS, DBS, SCS Epidural Katayama et al108 19 >80% improvement in VAS 2–18 years 6/19 SCS, 6/10 DBS, 1/5 MCS
MCS Epidural Sol et al109 3 >70% improvement in VAS 24–29 months 2/3
DBS Periventricular gray/thalamus Bittar et al110 3 >50% improvement in VAS 8–20 months 3/3
SCS Subdural Nielson et al98 6 Subjective pain relief 7–25 months 4 excellent, 1 good
SCS Subdural, endodural Hunt et al100 5 Excellent: complete pain relief Partial: incomplete pain relief Not noted 1 excellent, 1 partial, 3 no benefit
SCS Epidural Miles and Lipton101 9 Excellent: no narcotics Some: need for occasional narcotics 1 year 6 excellent, 1 some, 2 none
SCS Subdural, endodural Krainick et al99 61 % subjective pain relief Not noted 0% – 28
1%–25% – 7
26%–50% – 12
51%–75% – 13
>75% – 1
SCS Epidural Sanchez-Ledesma et al102 3 trials 6 implants >75% subjective pain relief 5.5 years 57% met success criteria
SCS Epidural Broggi et al104 23 trials 26 implants Verbally classified pain intensity >50%, life standard 2 years 58% met success criteria
SCS Epidural Kumar et al103 3 >50% improvement subjective pain relief 6 months to 15 years 0
SCS Epidural McAuley et al111 12 >50% improvement VAS 5–20 years 5/12
PNS Brachial plexus, sciatic, femoral Long112 4 Satisfactory pain relief 3–18 months 2/4
PNS Sciatic Nashold et al113 1 Satisfactory pain relief 8 years 1/1
PNS Brachial plexus, sciatic, femoral Campbell and Long114 6 >50% subjective pain relief 6–54 months 0/6
PNS Femoral Rauck et al97 1 Mean pain interference scores, pain disability index 8 weeks 1/1 70% and 52% improvement

Abbreviations: DBS, deep brain stimulator; MCS, motor cortex stimulator; PNS, peripheral nerve stimulator; SCS, spinal cord stimulator; VAS, Visual Analog Scale.