Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 19;104(4):798–806. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.01.008

Table 2.

Inhibition of the maximal current amplitude of the three compounds tested on all substitution constructs made

Constructs AZ868 (1 μM) A-967079 (0.2 μM) HC-030031 (10 μM)
Wild-type 72 ± 2 (n = 7) 60 ± 1 (n = 12) 80 ± 2 (n = 14))
M911A/M912A 26 ± 2a (n = 10) 61 ± 3 (n = 5) 84 ± 2 (n = 10)
L941A 71 ± 3 (n = 5) 74 ± 4 (n = 3) 81 ± 4 (n = 2)
S943A 69 ± 3 (n = 10) 63 ± 3 (n = 7) 78 ± 1 (n = 6)
F944A −5 ± 2a (n = 8) 3 ± 2a (n = 16) 75 ± 3 (n = 11)
T945A 45 ± 2 (n = 8) 46 ± 2 (n = 12) 74 ± 2 (n = 10)
I946M 57 ± 4 (n = 10) 67 ± 2 (n = 7) 81 ± 2 (n = 5)
V948A 41 ± 4b (n = 11) 27 ± 2c (n = 10) 77 ± 3 (n = 15)
I950F 33 ± 2a (n = 13) 36 ± 1 (n = 5) 75 ± 3 (n = 16)
Rat substitutions 3 ± 1a (n = 5) 30 ± 2c (n = 11) 73 ± 1 (n = 9)

Values are mean ± SE and statistical significance is based on a one-way ANOVA test versus the WT inhibition and significance is given by the p values as stated.

a

p < 0.001.

b

p = 0.05–0.01.

c

p = 0.01–0.001.