Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 28;28(1):105–112. doi: 10.1007/s00455-012-9418-9

Table 1.

Summary of previously reported sensitivity/specificity statistics for aspiration detection by swallow screening and clinical assessment tools compared to gold-standard instrumental swallowing examinations

Test and population Population Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) False-positive rate (%) False-negative rate (%) Blinding?
Daniels swallow screen [8] Acute stroke 92 66 33 8 Yes
Gugging swallow screen [9] Stroke 100 50 50 0 Yes
Standardized clinical swallowing assessment [10] Stroke 47 86 14 53 Yes
Volume-viscosity screening test [11] Heterogeneous 100 29 72 0 Yes