Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 20.
Published in final edited form as: Neuroreport. 2010 Jan 6;21(1):24–28. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e3283320d54

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

(a) Sample stimuli. (b) Difference score (atypical – typical) of each participant's sex-categorization latencies as a function of each participant's difference score (atypical – typical) of his or her N170 amplitude. The more enlarged the N170 was for sex-typical (relative to sex-atypical) faces, the more efficient sex-typical faces were categorized (relative to sex-atypical faces).