Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 20.
Published in final edited form as: Int Migr Rev. 2010 Fall;44(3):728–761. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2010.00823.x

Table 4.

Regression of Immigration Problems Index (1 = least problematic, 10 = most problematic) on key predictors, with robust standard errors.A

Variable OLS Coef. S.E.
County of
Residence
Person -- --
Chatham −0.202 −0.128
Gender Female -- --
Male −0.307* −0.125
Race and
Ethnicity
White (non-Hispanic) -- --
Black (non-Hispanic) −0.093 −0.177
Hispanic and other −0.754^ −0.406
Education No High School Degree 0.173 −0.248
High School, GED, some college -- --
Bachelor’s Degree or Higher −0.887** −0.147
Employment Non-managerial worker -- --
Managerial worker 0.218 −0.172
Unemployed 0.288 −0.333
Retired −0.301 −0.208
Not in Labor Market −0.175 −0.248
Competition
Indicators
Parent of public school student 0.466* −0.19
Own Finances are bad 0.126 −0.204
Direct
Contact with
Immigrants
Socialized with an immigrant −0.754** −0.134
Worked with an immigrant −0.498* −0.217
Hears foreign language very often 0.504** −0.128
Hears foreign lang. at work very 0.358 −0.221
Media Reads Newspaper Frequently −0.328* −0.132
Watches “Lou Dobbs Tonight” 0.326* −0.132
Immig. in media several times 0.106 −0.125
Tolerance for
Diversity
Born outside North Carolina −0.472** −0.144
Speaks a foreign language −0.572* −0.231
Has a foreign-born grandparent −0.094 −0.176
Political
Orientation
Liberal −1.395** −0.215
Moderate -- --
Conservative 0.396** −0.134
N 998
r2 0.30
A

Model includes dummy variables for age, coefficients not shown

**

p <.01

*

p<.05

^

p<.10

Source: New Immigrant Destinations Project survey, August 2008.