. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 20.

Published in final edited form as: Violence Vict. 2012;27(6):973–990. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.27.6.973

Table 4.

Bivariate Correlations among Perpetration and Victimization Psychological Aggression Scales using Frequency Scores

	1.	2.	3.	4.	5.	6.	7.	8.	9.	10.	11.	12.
1. CTS2 Minor	---	.58^***	.97^***	.45^***	.42^***	.36^***	.36^***	.51^***	.51^***	.57^***	.53^***	.57^***
2. CTS2 Severe	.41^***	---	.71^***	.19^*	.27^**	.39^***	.37^***	.35^***	.37^***	.31^**	.28^**	.35^***
3. CTS2 Total	.97^***	.57^***	---	.41^***	.42^***	.38^***	.39^***	.50^***	.53^***	.56^***	.51^***	.58^***
4. MMEA RE	.48^***	.09	.43^***	---	.55^***	.42^***	.46^***	.79^***	.56^***	.54^***	.62^***	.61^***
5. MMEA HW	.50^***	.12	.45^***	.51^***	---	.56^***	.63^***	.87^***	.58^***	.72^***	.71^***	.69^***
6. MMEA DI	.43^***	.11	.38^***	.46^***	.59^***	---	.61^***	.63^***	.49^***	.56^***	.53^***	56^***
7. MMEA DEN	.49^**	.19^*	.46^**	.56^***	.59^***	.59^***	---	.71^***	.65^***	.67^***	.70^***	.71^***
8. MMEA Total	.56^***	.11	.50^***	.79^***	.87^***	.67^***	.71^***	---	.71^***	.79^***	.80^***	.81^***
9. FPAS Mild	.64^***	.26^**	.62^***	.59^***	.61^***	.51^***	.57^***	.73^***	---	.80^***	.73^***	.94^***
10. FPAS Moderate	.67^***	.17	.62^***	.75^***	.69^***	.62^***	.68^***	.83^***	.79^***	---	.78^***	.93^***
11. FPAS Severe	.60^***	.07	.52^***	.72^***	.62^***	.52^***	.68^***	.75^***	.71^***	.83^***	---	.85^***
12. FPAS Total	.68^***	.23^*	.64^***	.72^***	.68^***	.60^***	.67^***	.81^***	.95^***	.92^***	.85^***	---

Note: CTS2 = Revised Conflict Tactics Scales; MMEA = Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse; FPAS = Follingstad Psychological Aggression Scale; RE = Restrictive Engulfment; HW = Hostile Withdrawal; DI = Dominance/Isolation; DEN = Denigration. Bivariate correlations among violence perpetration scales are presented above the diagonal. Bivariate correlations among violence victimization scales are presented below the diagonal.

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001