. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Feb 20.

Published in final edited form as: Violence Vict. 2012;27(6):973–990. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.27.6.973

Table 6.

Bivariate Correlations among Perpetration and Victimization Psychological Aggression Scales using Variety Scores

	1.	2.	3.	4.	5.	6.	7.	8.	9.	10.	11.	12.
1. CTS2 Minor	---	.41^***	.88^***	.46^***	.38^***	.32^**	.31^**	.45^***	.51^***	.51^***	.52^***	.56^***
2. CTS2 Severe	.37^***	---	.77^***	.24^*	.34^***	.52^***	.39^***	.49^***	.23^*	.32^**	.38^***	.34^**
3. CTS2 Total	.91^***	.72^***	---	.45^***	.45^***	.50^***	.42^***	.57^***	.48^***	.53^***	.55^***	.56^***
4. MMEA RE	.46^***	.30^**	.46^***	---	.52^***	.45^***	.49^***	.75^***	.68^***	.65^***	.64^***	.72^***
5. MMEA HW	.43^***	.32^**	.46^***	.54^***	---	.53^***	.51^***	.82^***	.63^***	.67^***	.62^***	.69^***
6. MMEA DI	.37^***	.28^**	.41^***	.46^***	.51^***	---	.64^***	.79^***	.54^***	.63^***	.58^***	.64^***
7. MMEA DEN	.30^**	.31^**	.33^**	.62^***	.51^***	.65^***	---	.82^***	.63^***	.66^***	.69^***	.72^***
8. MMEA Total	.48^***	.37^***	.51^***	.81^***	.80^***	.81^***	.84^***	---	.76^***	.81^***	.80^***	.86^***
9. FPAS Mild	.55^***	.26^**	.52^***	.73^***	.59^***	.61^***	.65^***	.79^***	---	.77^***	.69^***	.89^***
10. FPAS Moderate	.56^***	.29^**	.54^***	.79^***	.64^***	.68^***	.67^***	.85^***	.83^***	---	.82^***	.94^***
11. FPAS Severe	.63^***	.33^**	.60^***	.76^***	.62^***	.57^***	.63^***	.79^***	.79^***	.87^***	---	.92^***
12. FPAS Total	.60^***	.31^**	.56^***	.83^***	.65^***	.69^***	.72^***	.88^***	.91^***	.96^***	.92^***	---

Note: CTS2 = Revised Conflict Tactics Scales; MMEA = Multidimensional Measure of Emotional Abuse; FPAS = Follingstad Psychological Aggression Scale; RE = Restrictive Engulfment; HW = Hostile Withdrawal; DI = Dominance/Isolation; DEN = Denigration. Bivariate correlations among violence perpetration scales are presented above the diagonal. Bivariate correlations among violence victimization scales are presented below the diagonal.

p < .05,

^**

p < .01,

^***

p < .001