Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec 7;15(3):324–333. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfs181

Table 2.

Heart rate and achievement of study definition of rate control according to rhythm status and treatment group

Baseline rhythm status Treatment arm Baseline Month 3
Δ heart rate at month 3 P-value, Δ from baseline
Mean ± SD (n) Mean ± SD (n) Rate controlled
Atrial fibrillation Placebo 80 ± 14 (157) 81 ± 15 (149) 74/150 (49%) 2.2 ± 1.1 0.02
Bucindolol 79 ± 14 (146) 70 ± 13 (138)** 92/138 (67%)** –6.9 ± 1.3** <0.0001
Sinus rhythm Placebo 83 ± 13 (1086) 80 ± 13 (1021) 555/1021 (54%) –2.0 ± 0.4 <0.0001
Bucindolol 83 ± 14 (1090) 73 ± 12 (1008)** 756/1008 (75%)** –9.9 ± 0.4** <0.0001

Rate-controlled ventricular rate ≤80 b.p.m at month 3, no bradycardia adverse events through month 7.

Treatment group comparisons within rhythm subgroups: *P < 0.05, *P < 0.005.