Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 20;8(2):e57333. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057333

Table 2. Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis for STT for Identifying AD.

AUC& 95% CI Cut-off score(s)<$>\scale50%\raster="rg1"<$><$>\scale50%\raster="rg1"<$> Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Z (P)#
Group 1 STT-A$ 0.830 0.896–0.765 >80 91.7 72.1 0.36(0.71)
STT-B% 0.913 0.959–0.866 >220 92.4 75.0
Group 2 STT-A 0.906 0.947–0.864 >70 87.2 77.8 1.38(0.16)
STT-B 0.880 0.939–0.821 >200 90.7 72.5
Group 3 STT-A 0.835 0.878–0.791 >90 84.6 66.7 1.38(0.16)
STT-B 0.816 0.870–0.762 >240 76.4 69.9
Group 4 STT-A 0.877 0.916–0.838 >80 88.4 66.4 1.07(0.28)
STT-B 0.874 0.915–0.832 >220 89.5 67.0

Group 1: age ≤65yrs, formal education years ≤12yrs; Group 2: age ≤65yrs, education >12yrs; Group 3: age >65yrs, education ≤12yrs; Group 4: age >65yrs, education >12yrs.

&

AUC: area under the curve; $STT-A: time consumed for STT-Part A; %STT-B: time consumed for STT-Part B; Inline graphiccut-off score in seconds.

#

Comparison between STT-A and B of AUC.