Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 20;8(2):e57043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057043

Table 3. Subgroup analysis of the association between GSTT1 null genotype and HCC risk.

Polymorphism Null vs. Present No. of studies (cases/controls) Odds ratio M Heterogeneity PE
OR [95% CI] POR I2 (%) PH
GSTT1 All studies 21(3378/5400) 1.38[1.14,1.65] <0.001 R 71.1% <0.001 0.795
subgroup analyses by geographical location
Southeast regions in mainland China 16(2454/4019) 1.51[1.35,1.69] <0.001 R 67.1% <0.001 0.952
Central regions in mainland China 1(95/103) 2.02[1.15,3.56] 0.020 F @ @ @
Taiwan province 4(829/1278) 0.94[0.78,1.14] 0.546 F 24.4% 0.265 0.315
subgroup analyses by number of case
<100 8(561/1022) 1.34[0.78,2.28] 0.258 R 81.8% <0.001 0.961
≥100 13(2817/4378) 1.38[1.16,1.64] 0.002 R 61.0% <0.001 0.560
subgroup analyses by source of control
population-based 17(2845/3725) 1.32[1.06,1.64] <0.001 R 72.1% <0.001 0.746
hospital-based 4(533/1675) 1.60[1.14,2.26] 0.007 R 63.6% 0.041 0.929

M: model of meta-analysis; R: random-effects model; F: fixed-effects model. PH: P value of heterogeneity test. PE: P value of Egger’s test. POR: P<0.001 replace the P = 0.000 and the P less than 0.001. @: P values could not be calculated.