Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 20;8(2):e57043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057043

Table 4. Subgroup analysis of the association between GSTM1-GSTT1 null genotype and HCC risk.

Polymorphism Null vs. Present No. of studies (cases/controls) Odds ratio M Heterogeneity PE
OR [95% CI] POR I2 (%) PH
GSTM1-GSTT1 All studies 12(1763/2537) 1.78[1.26,2.52] <0.001 R 77.7% <0.001 0.535
subgroup analyses by geographical location
Southeast regions in mainland China 9(989/1659) 1.98[1.32,2.95] <0.001 R 70.3% <0.001 0.497
Central regions in mainland China 1(95/103) 2.72[1.45,5.11] 0.002 F @ @ @
Taiwan province 2(679/775) 1.04[0.81,1.32] 0.770 F 0.0% 0.536 @
subgroup analyses by number of case
<100 4(298/393) 1.73[0.70,4.28] 0.235 R 75.9% 0.001 0.115
≥100 8(1465/2144) 1.70[1.17,2.48] 0.006 R 78.8% 0.001 0.263
subgroup analyses by source of control
population-based 9(1411/1503) 1.75[1.09,2.80] 0.020 R 81.0% 0.001 0.531
hospital-based 3(352/1034) 1.86[1.16,2.97] 0.010 R 63.8% 0.063 0.856

M: model of meta-analysis; R: random-effects model; F: fixed-effects model. PH: P value of heterogeneity test. PE: P value of Egger’s test. POR: P<0.001 replace the P = 0.000 and the P less than 0.001. @: P values could not be calculated.