Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 21;5:6. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2013.00006

Table 1.

Comparative studies of CSF biomarkers in autopsy/genetic-confirmed FTLD and AD cohorts.

Study Patients 1−42 t-tau p-tau181 Diagnostic accuracy (AD vs. FTLD)
Clark et al., 2003 (10) FTLD(74) AD*73(4) CN AD < FTLD, CN CN < FTLD < AD NA No statistical analysis of FTLD diagnostic accuracy performed
Grossman et al., 2005 73 (11) FTLD(17) AD13 CN AD < FTLD, CN CN, FTLD < AD CN, FTLD < AD t-tau
AUC = 0.86, sens = 74%, spec = 82.4%
Bian et al., 2008 (30) FTLD(19) AD13 CN AD < FTLD, CN CN, FTLD < AD NA t-tau/Aβ1−42
AUC = 0.93, sens = 78.9%, spec = 96.6%
Engelborghs et al., 2008 (2) FTLD(73) AD*100 CN NA NA NA No statistical analysis of FTLD diagnostic accuracy performed
Koopman et al., 2009 (10) FTLD(95) AD AD < FTLD FTLD < AD FTLD < AD p-tau181
AUC = 0.85, sens = 91%, spec = 80%
Tapiola et al., 2009 (9) FTLD(83) AD NA NA NA No statistical analysis of FTLD diagnostic accuracy performed
Brunnstrom et al., 2010 (12) FTLD(8) AD* NA NA NA No statistical analysis of FTLD diagnostic accuracy performed
Irwin et al., 2012b (20) FTLD(41) AD* NA NA NA t-tau/Aβ1−42
AUC = 0.99, sens = 90–100%, spec = 90–96%
Toledo et al., 2012 (71) AD(29) FTLD66 CN AD < FTLD < CN CN, FTLD < AD CN, FTLD < AD t-tau/Aβ1−42 (ELISA)
AUC = 0.96, sens = 90, spec = 82%
p-tau181/Aβ1−42 (xMAP)
AUC = 0.98, sens = 100%, spec = 88%

Other diagnostic groups that may be present in some studies are omitted and only direct comparisons of FTLD group to AD or CN are reported. “<” or “>” denotes significant difference between groups and “,” denotes non-significant difference between groups, () denotes autopsy/genetic confirmed cohort.

CN, non-demented controls;

*

, AD group contains cases with co-morbid Lewy Body or Vascular Disease; NA, Not assessed; AUC, Area under the curve for receiver operating curve analysis; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; xMAP, luminex multiplex assay.