Skip to main content
. 2011 Jun 22;21(3):118–124. doi: 10.1007/s12471-011-0174-5

Table 1.

Study characteristics

Author Year Events Stress Patients (n) Mean age (years) Follow-up (years) Males (%) LBBB / Pacing SPECT result CD CD and AMI CD and AMI free survival (%) Annual CD rate (%/year)
High risk (n, %) Low risk High risk Low risk High risk Low risk High risk Low risk High risk
Lapeyre 2005 CD, AMI, Revasc. Ph. 93 74 5.6 ± 2.4 77 Pacing 23, 25% n.a. n.a. 10 7 97 63 1.4 6
Lapeyre 2004 CD, AMI, Revasc. Ex. 108 68 7.1 ± 2.8 66 Pacing 29, 27% 3 8 8 8 93 81 0.3 3.8
Nigam 1998 NCD, CD Both 96 66 3.4 ± 2.1 55 LBBB 26, 27% 4 8 n.a. n.a. 90 65 1.8 10
Nallamothu 1997 CD, AMI, Revasc., HTx Both 293 58 2.8 ± 2.3 59 LBBB 167, 57% n.a. n.a. 11 47 91 72 n.a. n.a.
Gil 1998 CD, AMI, Revasc. Ph. 69 59 2.8 48 LBBB n.a. 0 n.a. 0 n.a. 100 n.a. 0 n.a.
Wagdy 1998 CD, AMI, Revasc., NCD, CAG, HTx Ph. 245 69 3 ± 1.4 51 LBBB 84, 34% 6 20 9 27 93 55 n.a. n.a.
America 2007 CD, AMI, Revasc. Ph. 101 65 1.24 (max 2.48) 67 LBBB 101, 100% n.a. 14 n.a. 15 n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
Krishnan 1993 CD, Revasc. Both 69 68 2 (1.5 2.7) 61 LBBB n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a. n.a.
Usmani 2009 CD, AMI Ph. 76 56 24 ± 8 (months) 58 LBBB 24, 32% 1 5 3 8 98 79 1 11
ten Cate 2010 CD, AMI, Revasc. Ph. 197 69 2.6 ± 1.5 37 Both 96, 49% 2 13 4 17 97 77 0.7 6.4
Total       1347 65 3.2   550, 41% 16 68 45 129

AMI = acute myocardial infarction, CAG = coronary angiography, CD = cardiac death, Ex. = exercise, HTx = heart transplant, LBBB = left bundle branch block, n.a. = not available, NCD = non cardiac death, Ph. = pharmacological, Revasc. = coronary revascularisation, SPECT = single photon emission computed tomography