Skip to main content
. 2013 Feb 21;8(2):e57339. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057339

Table 6. Comparison of H serotyping and MS-H of E. coli.

Parameter H Serotyping MS-H
Diagnostic sensitivity Could reach 100% Could reach 100%
Diagnostic specificity Could reach 100% Could reach 100%
Analytical sensitivity Loop size of culture 5 colonies
Analytical specificity Antigenic epitope dependent Ionization dependent
Read-out Agglutination titer observation by eyes; process may require several steps Protein and peptide sequences analyzed by software; one step identification
Motility induction Routinely required Not routinely required
Rapidity to get result 3 to 5 days 4 hr for a single sample
Ease of identifying rough strains Impossible Possible; motility induction can be used to obtain result
Result consistency Motility induction and antisera dependent Instrumentation and software dependent
Robustness and ruggedness Limited; largely performed manually; may require optimal antigen/antisera reaction conditions Good; largely performed by machine; can tolerate wide range of sample amounts and different instruments
Throughput Limited, largely performed manually; not easily repeated Good; LC-MS/MS can run day and night; easy to repeat and obtain a better result
Sample stability Variation in bacteria growth Protein digests are stable
Consumables and labor used Antisera, culture media,Craigie tubes; Half day of labor Trypsin, lysozyme, nano-LC columns; instrument service contract; MS routine runs, half hour of labor
System suitability/accessibility Reference labs/institutions with antiserum or antibody production Institutions or service labs with MS capability