Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2012 Nov 16;6(1):11–22. doi: 10.1002/aur.1259

Table 2.

Hierarchical regression analyses predicting PDDBI and GMDS from GA (Step 1), ABR Group (Step 2), AMA Slope scores at four months (Step 3). Columns show adjusted R2, beta weights for GA, ABR, and AMA Slope, and overall model p values

PDDBI (n=74) Adj. R2 GA β
Step 1
ABR β
Step 2
AMA Slope β
Step 3
p

 Autism Composite
 Step 1 0.07 −0.29 --------- --------- .011
 Step 2 0.19 −0.19 0.37 --------- .000
 Step 3 0.25 −0.18 0.35 0.27 .000

 Social Discrepancy
 Step 1 0.09 0.32 --------- --------- .006
 Step 2 0.21 0.21 −0.38 --------- .000
 Step 3 0.36 0.20 −0.35 −0.40 .000

 Semantic-Pragmatic Language Discrepancy
 Step 1 0.03 0.20 --------- --------- .090
 Step 2 0.12 0.12 −0.30 --------- .009
 Step 3 0.18 0.10 −0.28 −0.29 .001

 Expressive Social Communication Abilities Composite
 Step 1 0.02 0.18 --------- --------- .135
 Step 2 0.07 0.11 −0.25 --------- .034
 Step 3 0.22 0.09 −0.22 −0.40 .000

 Repetitive, Ritualistic, and Pragmatic Problems Composite
 Step 1 0.06 −0.28 --------- --------- .017
 Step 2 0.14 −0.20 0.30 --------- .002
 Step 3 0.13 −0.19 0.29 .11 .004

 GMDS (n=67) Adj. R2 GA β
Step 1
ABR β
Step 2
AMA Slope β
Step 3
p

 Hearing and Speech

 Step 1 0.06 0.28 --------- --------- .021

 Step 2 0.13 0.19 −0.28 --------- .005

 Step 3 0.19 0.15 −0.30 −0.28 .001

 Performance
 Step 1 0.02 0.19 --------- --------- .134
 Step 2 0.02 0.15 −0.12 --------- .215
 Step 3 0.02 0.13 −0.13 −0.13 .242

Italicized: p<.05; bold font: p<.01