Skip to main content
. 2013 Mar;266(3):879–886. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120756

Figure 3b:

Figure 3b:

Bland-Altman analysis of pooled data comparing agreement between MR and PET CBF by using (a) bookend calibration and (b) global recalibration of average white matter (WM) CBF to 22 mL/100 g/min. Center dashed line shows bias with 1 standard deviation above and below.