Table 3.
Frequency distributions for demographic and neighborhood disadvantage characteristics by gambling status (N = 596)
| Overall | Past-year gamblersa | Frequent gamblersb | Gamblers with problemsc | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (col %) | n (row %) | aOR | 95 % CI | p | n (row %) | aOR | 95 % CI | p | n (row %) | aOR | 95 % CI | p | |
| Neighborhood inhabitants | |||||||||||||
| Low disadvantage | 221 (37.1) | 59 (26.7) | 1.00 | 18 (30.5) | 1.00 | 11 (18.6) | 1.00 | ||||||
| High disadvantage | 375 (62.9) | 129 (34.4) | 1.31 | 0.87, 1.99 | 0.20 | 62 (48.1) | 2.26 | 1.01, 5.02 | 0.05 | 48 (37.2) | 2.81 | 1.18, 6.69 | 0.02 |
| Neighborhood surroundings | |||||||||||||
| Low disadvantage | 240 (40.3) | 82 (34.2) | 1.00 | 35 (42.7) | 1.00 | 26 (31.7) | 1.00 | ||||||
| High disadvantage | 356 (59.7) | 106 (29.8) | 0.75 | 0.53, 1.08 | 0.12 | 45 (42.5) | 0.98 | 0.47, 2.04 | 0.96 | 33 (31.1) | 1.09 | 0.55, 2.14 | 0.81 |
All models adjusted for perceived racism, sex, race, household, subsidized lunch, intervention, and neighborhood factors
aReference group = nongamblers
bReference group = infrequent past-year gamblers
cReference group = past-year gamblers with no gambling problems